I do not use subject lines.
May. 12th, 2003 10:55 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
changelingI bound fourteen sections of Draco Dormiens today. This is the book I'm making in order to find out how to make books.
I don't know if any of you used to examine the bindings of your books when you were children, but I was always fascinated by books. The book of Fairy Tales I grew up with (Hans Anderson) must have been my parents, and I remember picking at the end papers when I was in grade six or so. It's this book that I'm using to try to reverse engineer a hard cover. It's rather difficult to get a fair idea of how the spine is constructed without taking it apart completely, but luckily the front cover is half hanging off this book, due to the front end pages being stripped almost completely. *looks guilty* I treat books with far more respect these days, and I don't colour in the end pages, nor do I pick at the front picture, even if it is falling off.
Anyway, the sections are the small number of pages sewn together to make up the "text block" - the actual block of pages. A hard cover constructed in this manner will have numerous sections glued or sewn onto some sort of gauze or similar. The book of Anderson's fairy tales (AFT) has fourteen. Draco Dormiens will have thirty-one...although admittedly DD's pages are smaller (due to paper constraints) and DD uses a more readable font - 10 point, as opposed to AFT, which seems to use 6 or 8. DD has smaller margins.
Sections are quite small clusters. Each section in AFT has four leaves folded in half and sewn together, to form 16 pages, and this is the basis I've used. As far as I can ascertain, each section seems to take in excess of half and hour to put together. I have stolen all of my father's bulldog clips that I could find - six in total - and are using them to keep the sections together. I think I may have to purchase some of my own tomorrow.
In the absence of a letterpress of my own, I've had to use our bubblejet printer, and I'm less than pleased with the results. I'm using 110 GSM cartridge paper (whatever that means) so I can print double sided, but the ink itself is less than durable. Computer printers are ridiculously sensitive to moisture, and several of the pages have already smudged a little. I must see if I can pick up some sort of fixative. Perhaps a trip to Chadstone is in order.
The book itself looks nifty, though. It's actually starting to look like a "real" book. I can only hope that I can put together the cover (by far the most difficult part, I should think) with as much skill.
By the by, if anyone knows how/where to purchase a letterpress printing press in Melbourne, Australia (or even within Victoria), I should love to hear from you. I may not have the finances right at this moment, but it would be relieving to know it was possible.
For those of you less than intrigued with my book binding ruminations, I can only offer a rather insincere apology. I hope that what I've written is fluent enough to be readable, even if one is less than enthusiastic about the subject matter. I dare say that it will pass on to other subject matter shortly. You have a friends page, no doubt; and I have a friendsfriends page, if you need further diversion.
I also know I'm behind in responding to comments and my friends page. *shrugs* I've been away for the weekend, and frankly, I just can't muster the energy.
I did absolutely nothing on the weekend, except talk to Grey's cats and finish Wee Free Men, reread Goblet of Fire for what is shamefully only the second time, and read Sheri S. Tepper's Beauty, which I'm in two minds about. I appreciate the need for beauty in the world, but dammit, I write horror fiction. Victorian it may currently be, in its lack of gore and homicidal maniacs, but I cannot, presumably, be purely blameless according to this book. This makes me feel a little alienated, and slightly uncomfortable.
I don't know if any of you used to examine the bindings of your books when you were children, but I was always fascinated by books. The book of Fairy Tales I grew up with (Hans Anderson) must have been my parents, and I remember picking at the end papers when I was in grade six or so. It's this book that I'm using to try to reverse engineer a hard cover. It's rather difficult to get a fair idea of how the spine is constructed without taking it apart completely, but luckily the front cover is half hanging off this book, due to the front end pages being stripped almost completely. *looks guilty* I treat books with far more respect these days, and I don't colour in the end pages, nor do I pick at the front picture, even if it is falling off.
Anyway, the sections are the small number of pages sewn together to make up the "text block" - the actual block of pages. A hard cover constructed in this manner will have numerous sections glued or sewn onto some sort of gauze or similar. The book of Anderson's fairy tales (AFT) has fourteen. Draco Dormiens will have thirty-one...although admittedly DD's pages are smaller (due to paper constraints) and DD uses a more readable font - 10 point, as opposed to AFT, which seems to use 6 or 8. DD has smaller margins.
Sections are quite small clusters. Each section in AFT has four leaves folded in half and sewn together, to form 16 pages, and this is the basis I've used. As far as I can ascertain, each section seems to take in excess of half and hour to put together. I have stolen all of my father's bulldog clips that I could find - six in total - and are using them to keep the sections together. I think I may have to purchase some of my own tomorrow.
In the absence of a letterpress of my own, I've had to use our bubblejet printer, and I'm less than pleased with the results. I'm using 110 GSM cartridge paper (whatever that means) so I can print double sided, but the ink itself is less than durable. Computer printers are ridiculously sensitive to moisture, and several of the pages have already smudged a little. I must see if I can pick up some sort of fixative. Perhaps a trip to Chadstone is in order.
The book itself looks nifty, though. It's actually starting to look like a "real" book. I can only hope that I can put together the cover (by far the most difficult part, I should think) with as much skill.
By the by, if anyone knows how/where to purchase a letterpress printing press in Melbourne, Australia (or even within Victoria), I should love to hear from you. I may not have the finances right at this moment, but it would be relieving to know it was possible.
For those of you less than intrigued with my book binding ruminations, I can only offer a rather insincere apology. I hope that what I've written is fluent enough to be readable, even if one is less than enthusiastic about the subject matter. I dare say that it will pass on to other subject matter shortly. You have a friends page, no doubt; and I have a friendsfriends page, if you need further diversion.
I also know I'm behind in responding to comments and my friends page. *shrugs* I've been away for the weekend, and frankly, I just can't muster the energy.
I did absolutely nothing on the weekend, except talk to Grey's cats and finish Wee Free Men, reread Goblet of Fire for what is shamefully only the second time, and read Sheri S. Tepper's Beauty, which I'm in two minds about. I appreciate the need for beauty in the world, but dammit, I write horror fiction. Victorian it may currently be, in its lack of gore and homicidal maniacs, but I cannot, presumably, be purely blameless according to this book. This makes me feel a little alienated, and slightly uncomfortable.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2003-05-12 06:51 am (UTC)Squathe!
Date: 2003-05-12 06:57 am (UTC)*sends love and devotion your way*
Re: Squathe!
Date: 2003-05-12 08:48 am (UTC)Re: Squathe!
Date: 2003-05-12 08:53 am (UTC)Re: Squathe!
Date: 2003-05-12 09:07 am (UTC)Re: Squathe!
Date: 2003-05-12 09:13 am (UTC)Re: Squathe!
Date: 2003-05-12 09:20 am (UTC)Heee.
Date: 2003-05-12 03:13 pm (UTC)Re: Heee.
Date: 2003-05-12 06:54 pm (UTC)It is very cool, but time-consuming.
Re: Squathe!
Date: 2003-05-12 06:58 pm (UTC)