Dualist fatigue.
Nov. 16th, 2007 09:03 amI'm still reading City of Bones, and I'm getting slightly annoyed about a plot element, the way I have frequently in recent times, including at the marvellousness that is Preacher.
I'm sick of dualist mythologies. No more angels and demons, where the bad guys can always be told by their rotting flesh, sores, lazy eyes, horns, stench etc. I'm not a monotheist or duotheist. I'm not Christian, Muslim, Jewish or Zoroastrian. I'm a polytheist. I want complex worlds where, if you're lucky, an orc might help your party into the keep. Of course, he'll probably be executed by his tribe later as that was a terrible betrayal of his people, but that's the point. People, human or not, have a choice. They can be good or evil depending on our outlook, and depending on their own.
I know there doesn't seem to be much out there – angels and demons are very, very popular. Pratchett's done it, and Holly Black's fairies are (thankfully) amoral rather than PURE EVIL*. Most of Diana Wynne Jones's fantasies tend not to be dualist, too, probably because hers are people driven rather than creature driven. Gaiman's obviously done it – Stardust is just about People, but some might have pointy ears or glow a bit; Neverwhere is about People; Anansi Boys and American Gods are polytheist. I'm not sure I can think of anyone who's done it better than Pratchett or Gaiman, actually. (No wonder I love the pair.)
So. Please, please advise me. Recommend me authors and books. Give me fantasies, urban or otherwise, that have shades of grey†. Make them sexy. Make them cool. Above all, make them readable.
And meanwhile, I'll get back to my NaNoWriMo and its polytheistic 1930s London, where there's a herm on every street corner, and little niches to the household gods outside people's doors.
* One of the things that annoyed me about City of Bones is the fact that the fairies are tied into the Heaven/Hell fallen angel mythos. I almost threw the book, then remembered that this is a historical viewpoint; just admittedly one that I don't like very much.
†I'm not very big on European world fantasies and/or epic fantasies. The few I have liked have generally been at least a little ironic, self-referential or funny.
I'm sick of dualist mythologies. No more angels and demons, where the bad guys can always be told by their rotting flesh, sores, lazy eyes, horns, stench etc. I'm not a monotheist or duotheist. I'm not Christian, Muslim, Jewish or Zoroastrian. I'm a polytheist. I want complex worlds where, if you're lucky, an orc might help your party into the keep. Of course, he'll probably be executed by his tribe later as that was a terrible betrayal of his people, but that's the point. People, human or not, have a choice. They can be good or evil depending on our outlook, and depending on their own.
I know there doesn't seem to be much out there – angels and demons are very, very popular. Pratchett's done it, and Holly Black's fairies are (thankfully) amoral rather than PURE EVIL*. Most of Diana Wynne Jones's fantasies tend not to be dualist, too, probably because hers are people driven rather than creature driven. Gaiman's obviously done it – Stardust is just about People, but some might have pointy ears or glow a bit; Neverwhere is about People; Anansi Boys and American Gods are polytheist. I'm not sure I can think of anyone who's done it better than Pratchett or Gaiman, actually. (No wonder I love the pair.)
So. Please, please advise me. Recommend me authors and books. Give me fantasies, urban or otherwise, that have shades of grey†. Make them sexy. Make them cool. Above all, make them readable.
And meanwhile, I'll get back to my NaNoWriMo and its polytheistic 1930s London, where there's a herm on every street corner, and little niches to the household gods outside people's doors.
* One of the things that annoyed me about City of Bones is the fact that the fairies are tied into the Heaven/Hell fallen angel mythos. I almost threw the book, then remembered that this is a historical viewpoint; just admittedly one that I don't like very much.
†I'm not very big on European world fantasies and/or epic fantasies. The few I have liked have generally been at least a little ironic, self-referential or funny.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 11:03 pm (UTC)What would you suggest to start with? I have a copy of ... erm, the red one ... Iron Council, but I rather failed to get through that the first time. This may not be a fault with Mr Mieville, but rather might have been a problem with the reading environment. Still, I might try a different one first and come back to it.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:08 am (UTC)Thanks for the recommendations, though.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:31 am (UTC)WHat are China's other books like?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-20 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 12:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:09 am (UTC)I'm looking forward to checking out UnLunDun. I've heard interesting things about it.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 12:28 am (UTC)- Mel
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 11:35 pm (UTC)One of the reasons I didn't write it was because I thought I'd completely fucked up the genre by trying to write it like that.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-15 11:56 pm (UTC)My first NaNo was a fantasy noir, where the main character was a lesbian witch who dressed as a man, and her partner was the standard fucked-up noir hero. Who had killed himself, and now hung around as a ghost.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 12:48 am (UTC)The Hollow Kingdom by Clare Dunkle
The Guardian's Key by Anne Logston
Poison by Chris Wooding
War for the Oaks by Emma Bull
The Hunter's Moon by O.R. Melling
Oh, and along slightly different lines, but something I think you'd enjoy:
Little, Big by John Crowley
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 01:53 am (UTC)Thanks for the list; I hadn't heard of anyone on it. How exciting! I *have* heard of Little, Big, but I can't remember where. I'm pretty sure it's mentioned a couple of times in the Encyclopedia of Fantasy by John Clute and John whatsisname, so perhaps that's what I'm thinking of.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 02:49 am (UTC)Little, Big is an odd book. I'm not sure I can ever explain it to anyone. I want to say it has a Victorian feel, and yet there are hints in it that place it in much more recent times. It's not quite about faeries, but it kind of is. I don't know, you just have to read it - and it's a large book, and it takes some commitment because it's not a breezy sort of read, but I think it's well worth it.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 10:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 01:01 am (UTC)Russian folk mythology ... more animist than polytheist.
Can dig out and lend to you if you're interested and can't find?
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 02:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:07 am (UTC)I'll check him out. But if his alternate fantasy world is strongly populated with angels, demons, and possibly Old Nick and/or Yahweh/Jehovah/Allah, I might leave him for later when I'm not feeling so sick of the Christian (etc) worldview.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:16 am (UTC)The Fionavar Tapestry is his first, big, unabashed epic, but it hurts SO GOOD. And is, in many ways, somewhat like LotR with a pagan basis instead of Christian (you have deities like Mjornir of the Thunder and Dana the Mother, along with Ceinwen who is like a Gaelic-clothed Artemis right down to " . . . you just saw me hunting/doing something by myself, you're now DEAD"). It has a Big Evil, but it's I don't find it a Satan comment, and in many ways the "good" guys are only really united because, well, if he wins EVERYONE loses. And I can't really be more explicit without spoilers. But. His latest, Ysabel, is set in the same, um, universe, sorta?
Song for Arbonne and Tigana are both set in entirely separate worlds and are standalones, but alt-earths, and almost entirely human focused. Lions of Al-Rassan is likewise very human-focused (I don't think there's any actual magic in it), and in the same reality as The Sarantine Mosaic, Last Light of the Sun and . . . wait, my bookshelf says that's it.
The last three are very much alt-earths, in that the history of these worlds parallel ours, so Sarantium is Byzantium and Al-Rassan is in Spain leading up to the reconquest, and LLotS is in England during the Viking raids. So yeah, in them, there are a lot of the monotheists, but he explores (interestingly and movingly, I think) the people involved, and the crashing between the pagan-polytheistic and the monotheistic in Sarantine Mosaic and Last Light of the Sun particularly, without really giving precedence to either worldview (beyond the fact that by the numbers, culturally, the latter won). Al-Rassan as I said I don't think has much in the way of magic or gods in it; its focus is much more the human involved, with no metaphysics really involved.
Anyway. I gush embarrassingly.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:24 am (UTC)*snerk*
No, not gushing embarrassingly. Very useful. Thanks for giving me an idea of the books!
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 03:36 am (UTC)Read any Hobbs? If not, the Liveship Traders series (detailing a world in which the best traders have ships that become sentient when their captain dies on board, or similar) is phenomenally good.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 10:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 10:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 10:33 pm (UTC)I enjoyed the book more or else, but... original thought was not among its virtues. At all.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-16 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-04 12:50 pm (UTC)